## The problem

How do we calculate a sample mean? This is probably one of the most basic questions in statistics, with as its common answer the following: Given a vector of sample values \(\bf{x}\) of length \(N\), the sample mean \(m\) is defined as \[m = \frac{1}{N}\sum^N_{i=1}x_i\]

But this first assumption, *given a vector of sample values*, recently did not hold for me. The sheer size of the vector that I needed to process made sure it did not fit on my computer. Even worse, I had no way of knowing how big this vector would exactly be! My question was thus: how do I calculate the mean of a stream of sample values of indetermined length?

## Solution

The solution to this was rather simple for calculation of the mean. We initialise the value of the mean to 0, and then *update* our current guess of the mean with the next value’s weighted deviation from the current mean. This happens like so:

\[m_{i} = m_{i-1} + \frac{(x_i-m_{i-1})}{i}\]

Reading the formula in words, the \(i^{th}\) mean is the \((i-1)^{th}\) mean plus the deviation of the \(i^{th}\) input value from this current mean divided by the current \(i\), i.e., the amount of values that have been input.

In code this is simple to implement:

```
set.seed(142857)
# let's assume we receive data of length 1234
streamlength <- 1234
# initialise m_i
m_i <- 0
for (i in 1:streamlength) {
m_prev <- m_i
x_i <- rnorm(1, 0, 3)
m_i <- m_prev + (x_i-m_prev) / i
}
print(m_i)
```

`## [1] -0.00210514`

Note that in the above code we never save the full vector \(\bf{x}\); we only ever save the current and previous versions of the mean. This is perfect for an extremely large, variable length input vector such as the one I talked about in the introduction!

```
set.seed(142857)
# let's assume we receive data of length 1234
streamlength <- 1234
# initialise m_i
means <- numeric(streamlength)
for (i in 1:streamlength) {
x_i <- rnorm(1, 0, 3)
means[i] <- ifelse(i == 1,
x_i,
means[i-1] + (x_i-means[i-1]) / i)
}
```

Notice the big changes at the start of the stream, and the smaller changes at the end, asymptotically converging to the “true” mean value that we set here at 0.

## Bayesian estimation?

We can also see this as a form of bayesian updating, if we turn the formula around like so:

\[m_{i} = \frac{(x_i-m_{i-1}) + i \cdot m_{i-1}}{i}\]

Here, we set the prior to be \(i \cdot m_{i-1}\), then we see \((x_i-m_{i-1})\) as our new data/evidence, \(m_i\) is our posterior, and \(i\) is the normalising constant. Cool!

## Update: More efficient!

The algorithm above translates nicely into the bayesian framework, but as with so many algorithms, it can be made much more efficient. It turns out that all we have to do is remember the `sum`

of the values input in the stream and a counter `i`

that indicates how many values went in. Then, when asking for the mean, all we need to do is \(m_i=\frac{\texttt{sum}}{\texttt{i}}\). Simple!

This is better for three reasons:

- It’s simpler.
- It’s less prone to numerical problems with your computer: you only perform one operation.
- This also extends to the variance and higher-order moments. For variance, we need to remember the
`sum`

, the`sum of squares`

, and the counter`i`

. Then, we can calculate the variance using the formula \(Var(X) = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2\) to calculate the variance: \(s^2_i=\frac{\texttt{sum of squares}}{\texttt{i}}-\left(\frac{\texttt{sum}}{\texttt{i}}\right)^2\). For each higher order moment, we need to remember a higher power sum in this framework.

Let’s do it!

```
set.seed(142857)
# let's assume we receive data of length 1234
streamlength <- 1234
# initialise
sum <- 0
sumsq <- 0
i <- 0
for (j in 1:streamlength) {
value <- rnorm(1, 0, 3)
sum <- sum + value
sumsq <- sumsq + value^2
i <- i + 1
}
list(sum = sum,
sum_of_squares = sumsq,
i = i,
mean = sum/i,
variance = sumsq/i - (sum/i)^2)
```

```
## $sum
## [1] -2.597743
##
## $sum_of_squares
## [1] 10948.2
##
## $i
## [1] 1234
##
## $mean
## [1] -0.00210514
##
## $variance
## [1] 8.872118
```

## The question

For the mean this was simple to implement. The question I’m pondering in the back of my mind throughout all this is the following: can *any* statistic be transformed into such a sequential statistic? How does this work for variance? Standard deviation? The median / other quantiles? If you let me know, I’ll be sure to update this blog post with the additions.